All Products
-
Raian IonescuMaterial quality very good. we have cooperate more than 10 Years. They trade lots kinds of steel material. All material quality good. They duty for all material quality. We are planing continue cooperate with them in the future
316L Stainless Steel Hollow Bar with Cold-Drawing Technique and Polished Surface for Marine Applications
Product Details
| Material | 316 316L | Outer Diameter | 1.0-1220mm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Thickness | 0.1-150mm | Length | 3m, 5.8m, 6m, 11.8m |
| Surface Treatment | Pickled, Annealed, Polished, Bright, Sand Blast, Hair Line | Shape | Round |
| Technique | Cold-Drawing | Carbon Content | ≤0.03 (316L) |
| Tensile Strength | 485 MPa (316L) | Yield Strength | 170 MPa (316L) |
| Elongation | 40% | Brinell Hardness | 217 HB Max |
| Rockwell Hardness | 95 HRB Max | Molybdenum Content | 2.00-3.00% |
| Nickel Content | 10.0-14.0% | ||
| Highlight | 316L Stainless Steel Hollow Bar,Cold-Drawing Technique Hollow Bar,Polished Surface Stainless Steel Pipe |
||
Product Description
316L Stainless Steel Hollow Bar ASTM A312 316L Hollow Bar
Product Overview
ASTM A312 316/316L stainless steel round pipe pickled for marine applications, offering superior corrosion resistance and mechanical properties.
Product Specifications
- Standard: ASTM A249, ASTM A268, ASTM A269, ASTM A312
- Material: 316, 316L Stainless Steel
- Outer Diameter: 1.0-1220mm (1/8"-48")
- Wall Thickness: 0.1-150mm (SCH 5S-XXS)
- Length: 3m, 5.8m, 6m, 11.8m, or custom lengths available
- Surface Treatment: Pickled, annealed, polished, bright, sand blast, hair line
316 vs 316L Stainless Steel Comparison
316 and 316L stainless steels are molybdenum-containing alloys with enhanced performance characteristics. 316L stainless steel contains slightly higher molybdenum content and offers superior corrosion resistance, particularly in marine environments. The key difference is that 316L has a maximum carbon content of 0.03%, making it ideal for applications requiring maximum corrosion resistance without post-weld annealing.
Chemical Composition Comparison
| Material | C | Si | Mn | P | S | Ni | Cr | Mo | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 316 | ≤0.08 | ≤1.00 | ≤2.00 | ≤0.035 | ≤0.03 | 10.0~14.0 | 16.0~18.5 | 2.00~3.00 | ≤0.10 |
| 316L | ≤0.03 | ≤1.00 | ≤2.00 | ≤0.045 | ≤0.03 | 10.0~14.0 | 16.0~18.0 | 2.00~3.00 | ≤0.10 |
Mechanical Properties Comparison
| Grade | UNS | Tensile Strength (MPa) min | Yield Strength (MPa) min | Elongation (%) min | Brinell Hardness (HB) max | Rockwell Hardness (HRB) max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 316 | S31600 | 515 | 205 | 40 | 217 | 95 |
| 316L | S31603 | 485 | 170 | 40 | 217 | 95 |
Product Gallery
Recommended Products